Free Winston.

Comments

#1

It was not the dogs fault to why the person got bitten, the person shouldn't of tried to break into the house and it's the dogs responsibility to protective its house

(Townsville , 2017-09-12)

#6

dogs are bloody beautiful,***** humans

(Brisbane, 2017-09-12)

#7

this is unfair, they have no proof of the dog actually doing what is said

(Gold Coast, 2017-09-12)

#10

I'm signing this because dogs should not be seized from families without proof of what the dog has done.

(yeppoon, 2017-09-12)

#16

Dogs are better than humans! Screw whoever took him away, *******s!

(Devonport, 2017-09-12)

#18

why kill a animal that was protecting its family?

(penrith , 2017-09-12)

#20

what a ******* joke that a dog gets put down for doing its job!

(Gold Coast, 2017-09-12)

#21

Obviously its the intruders fault dog was doing his job and stayed on property.

(Warrnambool , 2017-09-12)

#25

I'm signing this petition because it is unfair that a dog is put down for doing something that comes so naturally to all dogs. Instead of worrying about the dog, worry about the person who trespassed on private property.
A dog can NOT jump a 6ft fence!

(Maroochy River, 2017-09-12)

#29

because it's disgusting that the council can do this

(Gold Coast , 2017-09-12)

#32

I love dogs

(Brisbane , 2017-09-12)

#44

The said person should not have been on their property and none of this would have happened. Its their own fault, the dog should not be punished for protecting its family.

(Brisbane, 2017-09-12)

#53

They shouldn't be able to remove a pet without proof.

(Brisbane, 2017-09-12)

#57

Mackay council money hungry bullies

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#62

Winston is innocent he is a much loved family pet . I know him well he is my dog Archie's brother and has a lovely nature . He was only protecting his family and there house from an intruder.

(Mackay , 2017-09-12)

#63

The poor doggo done nothing wrong

(Brisbane, 2017-09-12)

#64

This dog doesnt deserve to die. How rediculous.

(Mackay , 2017-09-12)

#76

I'm signing because that is absolutely ridiculous. If they don't give you your dog back, call the police. That person was on your property at night, of course the dog is going to attack. Please call the police and file a lawsuit of they refuse.

(Victoria Point , 2017-09-12)

#81

Why was the person bitten entering the property at 4am the difg is just tgere protecting its property and owners

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#85

The dog was protecting his house. Do something to the intruders not the dog.

(Grafton, 2017-09-12)

#87

I'm signing because I believe it's unfair to take a dog and put him down for protecting his family from an intruder

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#92

A dog should not be put down for protecting its property and family

(Rockhampton, 2017-09-12)

#103

You should never take a dog out of a loving home and family

(Adelaide , 2017-09-12)

#108

Winston is far from a dangerous dog

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#109

The dog was standing up for its family and keeping them safe. They have no right to seize this families dog

(Booker bay, 2017-09-12)

#112

This happens too much, who defends the animal? The dog cannot speak for themselves nor are they given a chance! Give Winston a fair go!

(Melton South, 2017-09-12)

#113

I'm signing because the council should not have taken Winston as he was clearly protecting intruders from entering his home.

(Redcliffe, 2017-09-12)

#114

Because you are ending the life of a beautiful soul

(Caloundra , 2017-09-12)

#115

you can't kill dogs!!

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#116

The dog was in his own yard. If the tresspasser did not enter there would not be this problem. The dog is not at fault. How about prosecuting the guilty party and leave this poor family alone.

(Bundaberg, 2017-09-12)

#119

No dog should be taken away from the family home, because it attacked someone that was intruding into the dogs property!

(Mackay , 2017-09-12)

#120

This is sad and the dog should be returned to his family! He was protecting them as a stranger was trespassing on their property for Christ sake!!

(Caloundra, 2017-09-12)

#122

Please free Winston. A dog should not be seized because he was protecting his home.

(Perth, 2017-09-12)

#128

I'm signing this because I would be heart broken if it were my dog <3

(Kingaroy , 2017-09-12)

#131

Winston was defending his owners and their property from an unwanted intruder. Please spare this family pet, who has no record of violence to any other person or any other animal.

(Redcliffe, 2017-09-12)

#133

He's is a loving dog who was protecting his owner and his home. He should be free.

(Mackay , 2017-09-12)

#134

Iam signing because council procedures need to change. You should not be able to seize and destroy an animal without providing proof. I think that is wrong and to many innocent animals are being killed by council.

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#136

Stop taking animals away without reason!!!

(Brisbane, 2017-09-12)

#140

It's cruel to seize a family pet when all they were doing was protecting there house from strangers and if no proof is provided it's rediculous to be able to put him down, typical Mackay cousin

(Mackay , 2017-09-12)

#141

Because there's no proof

(Hamilton island , 2017-09-12)

#143

I'm signing because council's have too much power! You can't just claim a dog is dangerous without proof and kill it! It's not right and needs to be stopped!

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#150

I believe dogs have the right to protect their families and properties and if that means attacking an intruder in their own yard so be it. Attacks to intruders by a dog should NOT classify them as dangerous.

(Bundaberg, 2017-09-12)

#152

To destroy a dog and fine its owner based solely on an unsubstantiated complaint is unlawful.

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#153

I believe the dog was only doing what he was suppose to do protect his family.

(Mackay , 2017-09-12)

#155

I'm signing because I strongly believe this dog was doing its job and not in the wrong at all. Protecting his family and home! Strangers should not be jumping the fence anyway and they seemed to have deserved being 'attacked' by the dog.

(Maclean, 2017-09-12)

#156

Because owners have a right to feel safe and secure within their homes. This dog was simply doing his job. Shame on the person trying to break into their yard.

(Wangaratta, 2017-09-12)

#160

Sick of lawbreakers getting away with it. He shouldn't have been on property!

(Launceston , 2017-09-12)

#167

I'm singing because it is wrong to be seizing and putting down a dog / family member to a lot of families after it was protecting its home when a person stepped onto their property without permission

(Redland bay, 2017-09-12)

#169

I'm signing because it was a good doggo, he protec, he attac, but he also loved

(West Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#170

This dog is not dangerous and shouldn't be fined or put down for doing it's job.

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#171

he's innocent

(cairns, 2017-09-12)

#174

You can't accuse a dog for attacking an intruder - it's the dogs duty to protect - what if the kids were in the backyard and someone was trying to induct them - would you want you dog to protect or lick? You choose! Let the dog go!

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#175

This isn't right!

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#176

This dog should go home

(Carmila, 2017-09-12)

#177

This is incredibly wrong. This dog was saving his family's property just like he was supposed to.

(Mackay , 2017-09-12)

#178

The animal was protecting the home and property and the person bitten was obviously responsible for opening the gate to release the animal.

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#182

Winston should be congratulated not condemned

(Bucasia, 2017-09-12)

#184

Because its plain wrong how little evidence is needed for them to be able to kill pets. Its wrong, stupid and unjustified

(2324, 2017-09-12)

#186

Free Winston!!!! This is bullshit!!!!!

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#187

The dog was protective of its home beacuse there was an intruder in early hours of the morning. It is a family dog and loved and looked after.

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#188

mackay city council must be misled to take away a family right to look after there back yard at night .And by looking at this photo you can see this Dog is no Danger to the general Public.Council would be DOING injustice to this family and the rest of mackay residence by destroying this pet.

(mackay nth, 2017-09-12)

#195

I know this dog. It isn't dangerous. The "victims" were trespassing.

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#196

Stop protecting law breakers

(Mackay, 2017-09-12)

#198

This dog was protecting its property - ITS FAMILY! Loyal dogs do! FREE the DOG back to his FAMILY!

(Rockhampton, 2017-09-12)