Europaweite Videoüberwachung an Schlachthöfen und Dokumentation

BRUTAL EXECUTION OF SHEEPS BY OFFICIALS IN SWEDEN✦.
Ställ Länstyrelsen till svars för denna inhumana slakt!
PLEASE SIGN & SHARE WIDELY THIS PETITION▬►http://bit.ly/1n4WJdL
Translated through Google:(not really the best!)
✦About the video:On Friday, the brutal killing of some 50 sheep and lambs in Resele-Sweden following a decision by the provincial government!
◕The farmer owner has "djurförbud" ("Djurförbud" is a legal sanction of prohibition against keeping animals .In Sweden, a county administration order a person djurförbud after that someone is convicted of animal cruelty , unjustifiable failure supervision or care of animals or repeatedly convicted for violating the Animal Welfare Act)
But the animals remained on his farm. Therefore, they have been brutally slaughtered..
◕ The article is about a mass slaughter in a Swedish community and the reason for the slaughter is very frustrating to read about. The owner is banned from having animals on his farm but these sheep were still there which is against the law and the decision on banning him from animals. So why were the sheep still on his farm? To deal with this and "punish" the owner, the sheep were brutally slaughtered no matter whether they were healthy or not.. this is totally unacceptable!
◕allehanda.se previously in several articles talked about the pet owners in Resele, Ted Hopkins, who got djurförbud in February. During an inspection on March 20 discovered the provincial government that there were still horses, cattle and sheep on his farm. Police authority apprehended animals.
◕Read more: Animal disposed in Sollefteå http://www.allehanda.se/angermanland/solleftea/djur-omhandertas-i-solleftea
◕On April 8, the county government decided that the sheep and the lambs would be killed at the farm.
- What is happening today is that the police authority effecting the decision of the County Board. Two butcher's here, all will be killed and the carcasses are transported away for =>disposal, says deputy local police chief Jens Forsberg, on-site at the farm.
- Obviously it here a difficult situation. It is very agitated feelings here today, and we have a full understanding of.
Cattle and horses to be killed at a later date at an abattoir.
CAB's criticism is the basis for the decision djurförbud has mainly dealt with the lack of clean and dry berths and protection, sleeping hall was too small, that animal flesh was below average good, bad with litter and hazard risks. According to the provincial government action was never shortcomings.
Ted Hopkins believes that he has been mistreated.
- All that they've had comments on we have resolved, he says.
- Ewes hull was below average good, but then we gave them more fodder. That it had been badly scattered due to the controls occurred early before we had time to suede.
He also stresses that he sold the animals after he received djurförbud. They were certainly left his yard, but other people own them and will also take care of them. He himself has written on a different address.
County Board believes, however, that Hopkins actual contact with animals not ceased. The Decision states that animals must be moved from the property to animal ban shall be deemed complied with.
- It is not enough that other people ownership. Furthermore, we have found it difficult to make contact with the new owners, says Annika Wallin, head of the provincial government.
County Board would have preferred to avoid this situation occurred, but Wallin says that they had no other options.
- The animals are unsaleable because they are inbred and are not tested for certain diseases. And to move them to another farm when they are pregnant or have just given birth can not.
Ted Hopkins is upset that the provincial government does not take advantage of the meat.
- However, we can not guarantee the quality of the meat when animals are slaughtered so here on the farm. And transporting them to the slaughterhouse's not possible because they must not be moved, says Wallin.
CAB's decision on a disposal of the animals has been appealed to the Administrative Court. Something crucial which has not yet come. But while waiting for the provincial government has the right to effectuate the decision is, as long as the administrative court does not decide on inhibition, which they did not do.
- We could not postpone this any longer. We have given the animal owner many opportunities to address the deficiencies we observed, but this has not happened.