Save Strathcona Golf Course


Guest

/ #58

2016-03-14 15:35

Because selling public recreational land to a private developer to create another 1950's residential subdivision on the basis of nothing more than the "opinion" of a mayor who has had some sort of epiphany in which, 'truth' has been revealed to him alone is neither valid nor acceptable. He will be gone in two years but this kind of decision is not reversible and neither he nor this council has that authority without a verified public mandate. A council made up primarily of people at or older than 60 has no right to make this kind of decision the fallout from which will be borne by the 30 and 40 year olds who will be the citizens living here for the next 30, 40, and 50 years.