Citizens Opposed to the Toll Road

Contact the author of the petition

This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition Citizens Opposed to the Toll Road.

Susan Fields
Guest

#26 Stop Toll Road

2011-02-05 19:31

Please take the time to sign this. Mom
Donald Geddes
Guest

#27 NE DEnver Metro Toll Road

2011-02-07 19:14

I'm not convinced that this road is necessary! I am convinced that building a toll road represents the regressive position held by planners in our grandparents generation. If a road is nuilt in the future, it should by paid for by all citizens just as most other roads are built and maintained. Any roads should be equally available to all citizens, not just the elite wealthy citizens.
judy lehmkuhl
Guest

#28 alternative gravel mining

2011-02-07 19:47

If LaFarge can't use the proposed section 16, will they come back into Coal Creek Canyon and try again to mine the 'quarry' we have successfuly fought the last 15 years?
Forrest Jones
Guest

#29 Highway 93 and beltway politics

2011-02-10 13:01

It should come as no surprise to some of you, that the city council is littered with 'Progressive' candidates,(http://www.progressivemajority.org/target-states/colorado) who were elected by hopeful residents to mediate or mitigate many of our city's difficulties as we entered the next ten years' of growth.

As you can see, (http://www.progressivemajority.org/about-us and http://www.progressivemajority.org/search/node/colorado) these politician's stated goals to the Golden electorate are much different than their fundamental values and desires for this community. This organization brings an unstated goal of radical cultural and economic change (read, socialism) to every community it has come to.

In short, the electorate in Golden have been led to believe the city council and mayor have been performing due diligence to protect the quality of life and vested interests of Golden residents. In my opinion, this has not happened as the city now owes 40 million dollars plus in loans to who knows who, from who knows where. I'm not too sure how a population of 17,500 people, give or take a few, will pay it back. My guess is, the council and mayor think that (with reference to the 93 beltway) 'if we build it, they will come!'.

Wahoo! More people, strip malls, etc., ad nauseum, to tax, to pay our debts! (Can you hear and see your quality of life and property values fade into the din of increased traffic noise, congestion, and the smell of air pollution?) Is this a method we want to use in the name of 'sustainability'? Take a drive through northwest Arvada and see if you like the idea. Or should we return to an earlier idea of limited growth (which has many, many PROVEN benefits, not just promises from the proven failures of socialist idealogs) and pay as you go growth planning?

Hmmmm, just saying......

This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-02-11 22:12


Tom Reiley, MD
Guest

#31 The Toll Road

2011-02-18 19:15

We urge no compromise to opposition of the Toll Road. We cannot trust promises of funding for "imkprovements" to Rt. 6, particularly when McClaskey is the promiser. By maintaining our opposition we can help dissuade foreign investors in the Toll Road. We oppose any modifications to Rt. 93 that could affect property values.
Rob Medina
Guest

#32 CINQ Update

2011-03-03 20:44

Greetings,
The City of Golden held a critical meeting February 24 regarding the proposed Jefferson toll road deal. Golden was being offered a deal by the county that included some road planning, and the "promise" of money to fund one or two projects. This proposed deal was viewed by most people as inappropriate, and many came forward to voice their concern. In the end, city council decided to abandon the current deal, and pursue a much stronger, two pronged strategy. First, the city will move forward with a lawsuit keeps the pressure on toll road proponents, and act as a best, last resort if the city decides to sue. Second, the city will move forward with negotiations, but pursue a much more ambitious agreement.

(Excerpt from press release) “To seek an enhanced IGA that will provide greater certainty of funding for the priority elements of the Muller Plan; addresses noise and other pollution mitigation and monitoring for northern neighborhoods, including Mitchell Elementary; addresses improvements to Highway 93 north of Golden; addresses improvement of other arterials outside the city limits to disburse traffic; includes provisions for no non-compete agreements that will impact travel on other alternative roadways that serve the area; requires CDOT be a part of the process and agreement; addresses Rocky Flats contamination issues, particularly during construction if it occurs; and addresses timing of key roadway improvements in Golden and sequencing of those improvements before parkway construction begins. City Council further directs the City Manager to work with the city’s attorneys to develop options for the City to challenge the Jefferson Parkway approvals in court in the event that negotiations do not timely and adequately progress in a fashion that protects the City’s position. The City Manager and the City’s attorneys shall keep the City Council appraised of litigation options and possible deadlines. The motion does not preclude the use of other strategies by the City to advance the City’s position regarding the Jefferson Parkway.” (To read the City of Golden’s press release dated Feb. 25 http://www.getthefactsgolden.org/

City Council Must Hold Fast...
These developments are very good news for Golden as both council and residents are galvanized with a clear direction. The key issue is council must not retreat from these better terms. The voice of Golden residents is clear - if we pursue a deal, it must meet the full and complete needs of Golden, and toll road proponents must "pay the toll" to get Golden's cooperation. Again, city council must hold fast to these better terms. It should be acknowledged that Golden's council and staff have worked very hard on this issue, and many thanks should be given to council for their wisdom to understand that Golden has the leverage and power in any negotiation. CINQ encourages their continued courage, tenacity and wisdom. However, CINQ points out that having a "friendly" relationship with Arvada, Broomfield and Jefferson County is not the goal - protecting Golden is. If that means not having good relations with neighboring communities, then so be it. It is apparent that elected officials from neighboring communities don't care much about Golden, and are more interested in pandering to developer interests. Sorry to say, but road proponents have a long track record of questionable dealings on this issue, and they are not to be trusted.

It is important to note that Rep. Ed Perlmutter was at the Feb 24 meeting, and we appreciate his interest. Moreover, the Town of Superior Trustee, Debra Williams spoke last night, and stated that her community also opposes the toll road, and is pursuing possible legal action. Debra's willingness to come forward is much appreciated, and illustrates that Golden is not alone in its opposition.

CINQ encourages Golden citizens to talk with council members, and encourage them not to bend on Golden's terms. If a deal is done, the bar must be high. If toll road proponents cannot meet the full and complete needs of Golden, then legal action is required. If a lawsuit moves forward, the benefits should not be discounted. Slowing the progress of the toll road by legal action can result in diminished interest from investors among other unforeseen benefits. Obviously, other parties are also pursuing legal action.

Interestingly, the tact by toll road proponents is to “divide and conquer” – offering each community a deal to go along. In the Jefferson Toll Road minutes from December 2010, Kevin McKasky says, (paraphrasing), Golden and Boulder would go along by February. Here we are in March, and neither community is even close. You may have read that Boulder sent a letter to Interior Secretary Salazar, asking him to delay the Rocky Flats land sale to the tolling authority UNTIL Boulder gets its $5M from Jeffco for section 16; translation – Boulder doesn’t trust the county to pay. The key point is surrounding communities, Golden, Boulder, Superior, etc., should band together and help each other, and support each other’s interests. The outcome would be better for us all.

WHAT YOU CAN DO
1. Write Golden City Council and tell them to “Keep the Bar High for Golden” - citycouncil@cityofgolden.net
2. Sign a petition on this web site – (This petition was presented to Golden City Council on Feb. 24 with over 400 signatures).
3. Make a donation to CINQ. Donate on-line on the home page at www.gothebetterway.org
or mail a check to: CINQ, P.O. Box 715, Golden, CO 80402-0715

Rob Medina
CINQ - Citizens Involved in the Northwest Quadrant
www.GoTheBetterWay.org
info@GoTheBetterWay.org
720.261.2058
sex
Guest

#33 sex

2011-04-16 07:44

Having in dire straits is not the desert of sex oferty termination for the benefit of your retirement. But dear value debt such as belief funny man destined liable could be, specially if you can't human being out how to turn far-off of answerable for and begin compensating payment the following junhe5x4

This post has been removed by the site administrator (Show details)

2011-04-26 13:32


This post has been removed by the site administrator (Show details)

2011-05-23 17:56


This post has been removed by the site administrator (Show details)

2011-05-24 22:58


This post has been removed by the site administrator (Show details)

2011-05-29 11:16


This post has been removed by the site administrator (Show details)

2011-06-01 15:47


This post has been removed by the site administrator (Show details)

2011-06-07 15:47


Stop the lunacy of the Jacob Smith city council and his developer mafia

#40 Useless and inappropriate posts from toll road supporters

2011-06-10 13:53

Remove the inappropriate comments from Arabs and liberal developers who have no business posting sex and drug ads, or any other unassociated material with the express intent to repel legitimate posters.

Guest

#41 Buy accutane from the uk

2012-02-11 15:56

The accutane dried my skin and it was not oily like before I took the drug. It helped in newly developing acne and cleared up the acne I already had.
buy accutane online Site: http://www.protopage.com/how-to-buy-accutane

This post has been removed by the site administrator (Show details)

2012-08-26 14:02