STOP The Port Albert Master Plan

Comments

#1

I do not feel the master plan is in the best interest of the current residents.

Suzanne Alton (Goderich, 2021-08-12)

#2

I do not support the Port Albert Master Plan.

Correen Desrochers (Port Albert, 2021-08-13)

#3

I do not want to subsidize developers. These upgrades are to support new developments. A development fee model should be adopted.

Philip Dickson (Goderich, 2021-08-13)

#4

We do not support the Port Albert Master Plan, as it’s in the best interest of the developers but not of the current residents.

A & G Simon (Port Albert, 2021-08-13)

#5

We are paying our taxes for our own properties and haven’t really seen anything in return. The watershed is being destroyed!!!!! The “new development “ is not in the best interest of the village.

Maria Zsoldos (Port Albert , 2021-08-13)

#6

All fees should be taken on by developers and those who are looking to build new, it is unjust to transfer those costs to current property owners of Port Albert.

Gordon Bailey (Huron East, 2021-08-13)

#7

I don’t believe the residents should flip this bill

Sandra Culbert (Goderich, 2021-08-13)

#8

I feel that the master plan would be detrimental to the citizens of Port Albert.

Janet Dickson (Port Albert , 2021-08-13)

#9

I do not want the development to continue and have to pay to put in a road that we don’t want or need.

Adam Voisin (Waterloo, 2021-08-13)

#11

I object, due to the fact that current landowners are being asked to pay for road upgrades that they do not want, for the benefit of the developer of the subdivision that current landowners do not welcome and have great concerns about.

Gitta Voisin (Waterloo, 2021-08-17)

#12

My family has owned our cottage and farmed land in Port Albert since it was purchased from the Crown. I'm signing because the assessments allocated to our cottage property are excessive and unbearable, especially considering they are for road upgrades and drainage that we don't need or want. We have maintained our own roads since they existed at a small annual fee for each property owner using the roads. How is it even convcievable that we would be expected to be charged over $120,000 for our cottage property and over $400,000 for our small farmed land that we want to keep as farmed? It is clear that this plan is intended to make long time residents sell and leave to entice and make it easier for the developers who should actually be paying the bill for infrastructure upgrades.

Karen Hutchinson (Port Albert, 2021-08-17)

#13

I feel strongly that this plan does not reflect the best interests of the property owners and community of Port Albert. The costs allocated to property owners in this plan are astronomical and unreasonable. If this plan proceeds as outlined, it will destroy the community of Port Albert by forcing long-standing residents to sell their properties. In my opinion, the only reason this Master Plan is being pushed through is to entice developers to come to Port Albert to generate tax revenue - against the best interest of current property owners.

Vanessa Gregory (Port Albert, 2021-08-18)

#14

I object to this plan for many reasons.
One main one is because there are many inconsistencies in the plan; treating similar properties and similar "roads and driveways" differently and some being charged and others not being charged, even though they are similar in situation. Also, I do not want to pay for a road and drainage that is not needed. Our family has paid taxes since purchase of the farmed land from the Crown and received no services. If the Township insists on moving forward they should use the money we've already paid and received absolutely nothing for!

Barry Hutchinson (Port Albert, 2021-08-18)

#15

We have a lot of property in port Albert given to us by our grandparents it has been in the family 100 years so we are not giving it up . We will work on fighting everything that does not involve us we have everything we need so we are not paying for what we don’t need

Harry and lucille Restivo (Hamilton , 2021-08-18)

#17

Unfairly notifed, cost Unfairly divided .and is farm land and should not be developed

Stuart Worboys (Port Albert, 2021-08-18)

#18

I am OPPOSE to this master plan and the financial responsibility the township is expecting homeowners to pay.

Jeff Desrochers (Port Albert , 2021-08-18)

#19

I do not support the development of the subdivision and I think it is criminal to ask the current residents to pay exorbitant amounts towards the road upgrades.

Brad Voisin (Waterloo , 2021-08-19)

#20

Keep port albert as is!

Ellen Gaertner (Waterloo, 2021-08-19)

#21

Developers will make their money back on updated infrastructure. Why wouldn’t the municipality be optimizing this opportunity to save residents money on updates on unassumed roads when there is very high demand for development in this area. People will pay to build here. The developers will make lots of money. The road can be done without this absurd cost to residents who do not want the development to happen. The only reason it needs to be updated is FOR DEVELOPMENT So make them pay for it! This is ridiculous.

Robyn Adams (Port Albert, 2021-08-19)

#23

IMO the residents are expected to pay far too much for the benefits they will receive. Most of this cost should be borne by the developers/owners of undeveloped land once it is developed and become part of the new home costs . It is for this reason they need new roads and drainage. That is common in most municipalities (development fees). We have already seen a lot of building in PA, generating more tax revenue yet I have not seen any funds spent in PA (except possibly Anne st).

Patti McDonald (goderich, 2021-08-20)

#24

I’ve been a resident in The Port most of my like. The proposed plan will forever change the dynamics of this community. The environment will be severely impacted.

Nancy Butler (Port Albert, 2021-08-20)

#25

I'm signing because I do not agree with the taxes. The taxes should be applied to everyone in ACW equally not just properties that are in direct contact with proposed construction.
some pockets are being lined while ours are being fleeced.

Stewart Dickson (Port Albert, 2021-08-20)

#26

I am not opposed to responsible growth, but placing infrastructure costs on current ratepayers for the benefit of future development is outrageous. We pay a premium in taxes and receive very little services, yet these funds have not been allocated for budgeted projects. Our representation is not considering the true impact and implications their decisions will have on the future of this community. I can't imagine this flawed plan being the legacy of our current council.

Mike Gilmore (Port Albert, 2021-08-20)

#27

ACW is about to spend $13,000,000 to fund a number of infrastructure projects that are not needed by the Port Albert residents - the intent is have affected property owners pay 50% and the general tax base to pay the other 50%.

This is a massive spend by ACW and further a significant burden on property owners.

Jonathan Lowry (Port Albert, 2021-08-20)

#28

What is expected to be paid by current land owners is ridiculous, all for the benefit of the developers and township.

Brigitte Cudmore (Port Albert, 2021-08-20)

#29

I object to the master plan because I feel residents of PA should not be charged outrageous amts to benefit the builders.

Val Hardy-Ristau (Port Albert, 2021-08-21)

#30

This is not okay, this is unfair to current residents. Current residents should not be subjected to pay for roads and sewage they were never needing to begin with. With Covid this could cause people to lose their homes or other possessions.

Jessica Quinlan (Port Albert , 2021-08-21)

#31

I feel it is grossly unfair and unjust that current landowners should feel any brunt of the expense for "development" that we neither asked for nor encourage , not to mention the impact to the ecosystem. Shame on any and all in favor of emptying our pockets to appease the few.

Allan Gutcher (Port Albert, 2021-08-21)

#32

I do not support the master plan.

Joel Coulthard (Port Albert , 2021-08-21)

#33

I am a concerned citizen who has relatives and friends in this area and believe this plan to be unconstitutional and not wanted by citizens living there.

Karen Traynor (St mary’s, 2021-08-21)

#34

As a great grandchild of the original property owners from so long ago, I feel this is a shame that our family land along with much of the beautiful town is looked at as an investment to future homes. We have had no issues with any of the roads in town, especially issues that would cost the community millions of dollars. From all in the community, including all the wildlife, I strongly believe the master plan is not in our best interest.

Aleah and Jordan Gowdy (Port Albert , 2021-08-21)

#35

I do not support this agenda

Morgan McEllistrum (Port Albert , 2021-08-21)

#36

I live in Port Albert, and I am fine with how things are currently. The upgrades are unnecessary

Sarah McEllistrum (Port Albert, 2021-08-22)

#37

I am a part owner of an impacted cottage.

Robert Faulhammer (Port Albert, 2021-08-22)

#38

I oppose the Port Albert Master Plan.

Jordan Dickson (Parkhill , 2021-08-22)

#39

I live here and I don't believe we have to pay more so developers get richer at our cost

Karen Fooks (Port Albert , 2021-08-22)

#40

I’m signing because my daughter and her family live in Port Albert and are greatly affected by this nonsense of a “money grabber” that serves no benefit to them at all!! Enough is enough!

Nicole Traynor (Goderich , 2021-08-22)

#41

As someone who grew up in Port Albert and plans to one day to return this is just wrong.

Rhonda Floriant (Goderich, 2021-08-22)

#42

I don,t think this is fair or needed . The developers are getting a free ride on the backs of the residents of Port Albert

James Clark (Portalbert, 2021-08-22)

#44

I object to the Port Albert Master Plan. And in contradiction to the Townships position I strongly DO NOT support the Port Albert Master Plan. In addition, it is imperative that the public meeting in September should NOT be a Zoom meeting. I personally don't feel comfortable with a Zoom meeting. And this is too important of an issue for many people like myself to feel unable to fully participate. This needs to be an in-person public meeting.

Debbie Elissat (Port Albert, 2021-08-22)

#45

I love my one lane dirt road. Considered by some as no more then a "goat path". It is family owned and we plan on keeping it that way. So this plan can go to hell and leave us alone. How would you like it if someone came up to you and said, " I don't like your gravel driveway! I want it paved and wide enough to fit two cars beside each other. Just incase someone in this town wants to park there." "Also your backyard is huge, let's divide that into lots just incase you sell in the future." You would tell that person to get lost. Which they reply, "No no, we thought about this and you will do it and the best part is you have to pay for all the improvements." This is exactly what this plan is saying to me and my family! I plead with everyone concerned don't let these people dictate and bully us into what they have wanted for years.

Donna Gutcher (Port albert, 2021-08-22)

#46

Because I don’t like what’s going wrong. In Port Albert

Brian Draper (Port Albert , 2021-08-22)

#48

I do not support the master plan.

Brooke Snell (Port Albert, 2021-08-22)

#50

firstly i do not believe the amounts are accurate or a fair amount. I am curious as to how counsellors think I can come up with my portion of the assessment, as a senior who now lives on a fixed income. There are several others on Ashfield and Wellington Street who are in a similar position. At 70 years old I cannot imagine taking another mortgage on my home to pay for this. IF I cannot afford something I do not canvass my neighbors to pay for it. I feel counsel is ramrodding this through , taking advantage of the COVID scenario, and using zoom meetings when many seniors are lucky to send and email, let alone figure out how to get into a zoom meeting. For 35 years I have listened to counsel brag about the lowest tax rates in the county, now it seems that they failed to realize to start a contingency fund to offset the cost of the work, yet managed to come up with funding to build an elaborate addition to the township office space. Why am I paying for development costs for current and future developers. I have asked for road improvements for 25 years yet was repeatedly told that it was not in the township budget. Development for the past 5 years has emphasized the need for an improved road and drainage system but I do not see anywhere that the developers both present and future are incurring any of the costs. Imagine me trying to sell my home and then telling a potential buyer, "oh yea, in a year or so you will be paying $15,000 for drainage and road", even in the current real estate market that will cost me in the selling price, not the potential buyer. Is there not any government funding for these types of infrastructure projects? This is a rather disjointed comment and a bit wordy but it reflects the anxiety I am experiencing regarding this whole issue.

Mark Ryan (GODERICH, 2021-08-23)

#51

I'm signing this petition due to the fact this is crazy trying to make residents pay for this.

Donna Leddy (Lucknow, 2021-08-23)

#52

Developers should pay their own way not on the back of taxpayers. Should be a live meeting not a zoom meeting.

Marilyn Brickman (Port Albert, 2021-08-23)

#53

Unwanted, unneeded development. Costs are hugely disproportionate in comparison to the benefit received by those who will be charged.

Nancy Budarick (Goderich, 2021-08-24)

#54

I’m signing because this is where I grew up, where my parents live and the place I still visit and call home.

Amy Ditner (Exeter, 2021-08-24)

#55

Because I go to port Albert often and don't want to see it become over developed

Karissa Bos (Kucinow, 2021-08-24)

#56

Because I don’t want port Albert to change and think it is in fair to the current people who already live there.

Rachael Jeffrey (Lucknow, 2021-08-24)

#58

The road and drainage does not need to be upgraded. If this changes due to future development, the costs should be incurred by the builder.

Heidi Salvador (Waterloo, 2021-08-25)

#59

I agree with this petition

Levi Salvador (Waterloo, 2021-08-25)

#60

Naughty

Ben Salvador (Conestogo, 2021-08-26)

#63

I am signing because I oppose the proposed Master plan

Brent Mikitish (Port Albert, 2021-08-31)

#64

I do not agree with plan proposal

Birgit Robson (Port Albert, 2021-09-01)

#65

Developers should pay their own way not on the back of taxpayers. Local residents are being unfairly charged exorbitant costs for something they do not want to happen anyway. I join everyone else in opposing this plan.

Regarding meetings:-

If the Township need to call a meeting then it must be an in person public meeting and not a zoom meeting. If this is not possible at the moment due to COVID then the process should be frozen until a proper face to face public meeting can be held. If that means waiting a few months until COVID restrictions allow this to happen then so be it.

Philip Barker (Port Albert, 2021-09-02)

#66

I have cottages there for 40 years. My family has been part of the community for over 125 years. We feel we do t need to be a part of the huge financial costs for new homes.

Cheryl Duckworth (Port Albert , 2021-09-03)

#67

This plan does not consider the opinions or concerns of property owners in this area regarding property taxes. Current owners should not be expected to foot the bill for future developer’s plans.

Evan Dickson (Port Albert, 2021-09-04)

#68

High cost of taxes seem to be unreasonable. Doesn't make sense to tax a small group within ACW community were all will benefit in the end.

Bonnie Dickson (Port Albert, 2021-09-05)

#69

Downloading development costs is a sneaky move on the part of council.

Giselle Lutfallah (Port Albert, 2021-09-05)

#70

No thanks.

Veronica Gagnon (Goderich, 2021-09-05)

#71

I oppose the Port Albert Master Plan.
I oppose any of the 13 projects within the 7 steps of the Proposed Phasing Plan, that taxes neighbors, as a means to finance the infrastructure work, required by ACW policy, to lift VR1-H zoning holds on developer owned lands.
I'm opposed to equally applying the municipal term "benefit", to all surrounding property's, when the act of dipping into the neighbor's bank accounts for subsidies, vastly favors both ACW Township and developer/land speculators.
I oppose the exclusive use of Zoom for this public meeting. Following current covid guidelines, host this meeting outside, at the township office, to utilize the township's Zoom hosting technology. Accommodate the maximum number of ratepayers both outside and inside within the guidelines. Have only the Mayor and township Zoom host attend in person so that maximum ratepayers can attend. All other ratepayers, Councilors, County, Township and BM Ross staff attend remotely via Zoom.

Rob Fleming (Port Albert, 2021-09-05)

#72

I am signing this because this Master Plan is only going to benefit the developers and ruin this pristine area. Residents cannot afford to foot the bill for roads etc. And they shouldn't have to! Port Albert needs to be protected!

Linda Birks (Goderich, 2021-09-06)

#73

The financial impact will force me to sell and secondly I moved here to get away from city life and do not want to see the community destroyed by developers

Keith McEllistrum (Port Albert, 2021-09-06)

#74

This project is just wrong. On so many levels.

Marlene McEllistrum (Port Albert, 2021-09-06)

#75

This upgrade doesn’t benefit me , is costly and unnecessary

Steve Maize (Port Albert, 2021-09-06)

#76

I'm signing because I am a concerned rate payer.

Ronald Daer (Pt Albert, 2021-09-06)

#77

I am affected by the Port Albert Master Plan

Doris Daer (Pt Albert, 2021-09-06)

#78

I’m signing because I do not think taxpayers should pay for roads and drains that only need upgrading because of developers plans. We should not pay so developers can profit.

Wendy Fisher (Port Albert , 2021-09-06)

#79

I’m signing because a few years ago the council payed for a study to see if Victoria street drained needed upgrading. At that time it was not deemed necessary. That only thing that’s changed between then and now is the development off Russell street. I feel that the developers should pay for these upgrades not the taxpayer. Also for some reason the township does not feel obligated to take on any portion of the cost for the drain upgrades. Instead putting 100% of the expense in the taxpayer hands.

Garry Fisher (Port Albert, 2021-09-06)

#80

I do not agree with the unreasonable amounts being charged to residents of Port Albert for services not wanted or requested. The Township and Municipality should inform themselves on how such matters are dealt with in larger cities and adopt their financing structures....meaning no cost to their residents or at least a minimal one.

Brigitte Bar (Goderich(Port Albert), Ontario, 2021-09-07)

#81

I don't agree with the township pushing through this master plan on Port Albert.

Sonia Dickson (Port Albert , 2021-09-07)

#82

I oppose the Port Albert Master Plan.

Wendy Moorcroft (Port Albert, 2021-09-07)

#83

How do you expect us to pay that much on a fixed income? We moved to Port Albert to retire. We will have to compromise our nutrition, heat, gas for our car, holidays etc... To pay for development here. They want to build let them pay for the improvment. They are making money, lots of money which we do not. Isn't this why we pay taxes?

Yvette Watson (Port Albert, 2021-09-09)

#84

The costs in this proposal are exasperating for something that is not wanted by the residents and does not benefit them.

Pam Lambourn (Port Albert, 2021-09-10)

#85

We feel this method of billing citizens is ludicrous and the amount expected for us to pay is insane.

Leon and Dianne Bradshaw (Port Albert, 2021-09-10)

#86

I think it is unfair that the residents that do not wish all this development, should have to pay. I feel it should be the developers that pay as they are the ones that benefit from the changes. I understand that some of the costs to residents are beyond reasonable.

Michele Miller (Port Albert, 2021-09-11)

#87

I am totally against it ! We do not need it.

Carolyne Cluett (Port Albert, 2021-09-11)

#89

Development should pay for development. Pretty simple. The insane financial impact being put on existing taxpayers is completely unfair. This is morally and ethically wrong. Please do the right thing and listen to the people.

Bob Brickman (Port Albert, 2021-09-12)

#90

I’m a local resident

Tammy Rea (Port albert, 2021-09-12)

#91

We don't need or want this plan to go forward.
This only benefits developers not the tax payers.

Douglas Sutton (Port Albert, 2021-09-14)

#92

We don’t support the servicing master plan, and the costs associated with it. Residents don’t want it and don’t need it.

Gail and Paul Shearer (Port Albert, 2021-09-18)

#93

Local resident

Dave Consitt (Port albert, 2021-09-19)

#94

I am signing this to advise that I am totally against the Master Plan due to the expense charged to the property owners for the development of the roads. The developers are the ones that will gain from this project and it should be paid for from the money they will be putting money into a develper fund at the township. What is happening with this money in the fund, also if the develpers are not putting in enough the money in the fund at the town, then the Master Plan should be redone. Home owners and cottagers should not be penalized by paying for a project that will not benifit us. Also, the township should be seeking government grants to pay towards the project.

Loretta Boucher (Port Albert, 2021-09-21)

#95

I object to the costs proposed by the Port Albert master plan.

Amanda McFarland (Port Albert, 2021-09-21)

#96

I oppose the plan and the unfair burden development puts on the local community. I am also against development near the lake as it compromise the waters.

Amanda McFarland (Hamilton, 2021-09-21)

#97

I own a cottage in Port Albert, and feel this "Master Plan" is truly not in the best interest of the residents of Port Albert.

Robert Plaenk (Hamilton, 2021-09-22)

#98

I’m against the Master Servicing Plan.

Ron Durnin (Port Albert, 2021-09-22)

#99

I’m signing because our property has been in our generations for years and it’s not right the fees were being asked to pay for a seasonal property

Michelle Mercanti (Hamilton , 2021-09-22)

#103

I am signing because we have lived here for most of our Family life. Our kids just bought property in Port Albert to be closer to us. We retire in 2 years, at least I thought so. How do u expect people our age to pay a huge amount and try to retire. I have worked hard to get where I am and be able to retire, but now my heart is heavy.
This is not fair, make the developers pay, we did not ask for this.

Patti Maize (Goderich , 2021-09-28)

#104

I am signing because I grew up in Port Albert, it is my home town. Port Albert will always be "home". My parents, are long time residence. My sister has recently purchased property to build a home for her family in our beloved Port Albert. I am signing to show support and stand behind my family and life long friends and home town community members. I hope to purchase a home or land to build in Port Albert in the years to come and have invested interest in the future of Port Albert.

Jeni Maize (Georgetown, 2021-09-29)

#105

I don't believe the residents should pay

Randy Maize (RR#3 Goderich , 2021-10-01)

#107

I have a lot and plan to build someday.

Jorel Price (London , 2021-10-12)

#108

We just purchased a house on south street because we like the small village & are retiring there with lots of wide open spaces around us and a small community atmosphere. .This proposal is encouraging development, making it easier & cheaper for developers to make the existing PA residents to help pay for their costs to their advantage.

Tracy Aldrich (Port Albert, 2021-11-04)

#110

I object to the Port Albert master plan. This is not acceptable by my family. The cost to me is unacceptable as I am a retiree living on a fixed pension.
signed: Paul Shearer

Paul Shearer (Port Albert , 2022-09-18)



Paid advertising

We will advertise this petition to 3000 people.

Learn more...